Digital Twin Integration, Maintenance Decisions, and Smart Bridge Operations

Authors

  • Leonard Ng Faculty of Engineering, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author
  • Franziska Zimmermann Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany Author
  • Greta J. Stein Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany Author

Keywords:

Digital Twin, Bridge Engineering, Predictive Maintenance, Structural Health Monitoring, Maintenance Decisions

Abstract

The digital twin paradigm represents a significant shift in civil infrastructure management, offering a dynamic cyber-physical connection to bridge structural health monitoring. Although the technical concepts of digital twins have been widely discussed, empirical evidence of their direct integration into operational maintenance decision-making remains limited. This paper examines this integration through a detailed case analysis of the Hanjiang River Smart Bridge, a major cable-stayed asset featuring a multi-layered digital twin system. We outline the architectural framework of the digital twin, focusing on how real-time sensor streams are integrated with a dynamically calibrated finite element model to provide predictive analytics. The operational evidence shows that integrating the digital twin into the decision-making workflow reduced the time to detect structural anomalies from over seventy-two hours to just over two hours, while decreasing the false alarm rate to approximately three percent. By substituting scheduled preventive repairs with demand-driven predictive interventions, the operating agency lowered scheduled maintenance costs by nearly thirty percent. These results highlight the potential of digital twins to transform infrastructure maintenance from reactive and schedule-based approaches to proactive, reliability-centered paradigms.

References

1. Kudama, G.; Dangia, M.; Wana, H.; Tadese, B. Will digital solution transform Sub-Sahara African agriculture? Artif. Intell. Agric. 2021, 5, 292–300.

2. Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics; Sage Publications Limited: London, UK, 2024.

3. Barbier, E.B. Overcoming digital poverty traps in rural Asia. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2023, 27, 1403–1420.

4. Urbancikova, N.; Manakova, N.; Ganna, B. Socio-economic and regional factors of digital literacy related to prosperity. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 2017, 21, 124–141.

5. Daum, T. Digitalization and skills in agriculture. Outlook Agric. 2025, 54, 171–181.

6. Osorio-Gómez, C. C., Herrera, R. F., Tupėnaitė, L., & Pellicer, E. (2025). The digital organization transformation (DOT) model: Bridging digital transformation and organizational structures in construction firms. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 31(8), 909–925.

7. Kandemir, B.; Özceylan, E.; Tanyaş, M. Redesign, Smart and Digital Enablement of Sales and Operations Planning Processes: A Study of White Goods Manufacturing. In Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Theory and Applications; Kahraman, C., Haktanır, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 221–238.

8. Su, M.; Su, Z.; Bae, S.H.; Li, J.; Park, K.S. An exploration of shipbuilding price prediction for container ships: An integrated model application of deep learning. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2025, 59, 101248.

9. Hashem, G. (2019). Organizational enablers of business process reengineering implementation: An empirical study on the service sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(2), 321–343.

10. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming, X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & Management, 56(3), 445–461.

11. Enyejo, J.O.; Fajana, O.P.; Jok, I.S.; Ihejirika, C.J.; Awotiwon, B.O.; Olola, T.M. Digital twin technology, predictive analytics, and sustainable project management in global supply chains for risk mitigation, optimization, and carbon footprint reduction through green initiatives. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2024, 9, 1344.

12. Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2022). Beyond playful learning—Serious games for the human-centric digital transformation of production and a design process model. Technology in Society, 71, 102140.

13. Bondar, S., Hsu, J. C., Pfouga, A., & Stjepandić, J. (2017). Agile digital transformation of system-of-systems architecture models using Zachman framework. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 7, 33–43.

14. Whicher, D.; Ahmed, M.; Israni, S.T.; Matheny, M. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril; National Academy of Medicine; The Learning Health System Series; Section 6: Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK605954 (accessed on 15 April 2026).

15. Ogbuefi, E.; Mgbame, A.C.; Akpe, O.E.; Abayomi, A.A.; Adeyelu, O.O. Operationalizing SME growth through real-time data visualization and analytics. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud. 2024, 4, 2033–2054.

16. Ahokas, J.; Kiiski, T.; Malmsten, J.; Ojala, L.M. Cybersecurity in ports: A conceptual approach. In Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment, Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Hamburg, Germany, 12–13 October 2017; epubli GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 23, pp. 343–359.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles