Comparing Platform Integration Maturity and Decision Speed in Energy Utility Operations

Authors

  • Emily Kim College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Author
  • Michael M. Hernandez College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Author
  • Brianna E. Taylor College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Author

Keywords:

Platform Integration, Operational Decision Speed, Energy Utility Operations, Process Modeling, Software Engineering

Abstract

The modern energy utility sector is undergoing a profound digital transformation driven by the integration of distributed renewable energy sources, smart grid technologies, and real-time sensor networks. Managing these complex systems requires rapid operational decision-making, which is heavily constrained by the integration maturity of disparate enterprise platforms. This paper presents a comprehensive process modeling framework that correlates platform integration maturity with decision speed in energy utility operations. By analyzing data flows across Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition systems, Advanced Metering Infrastructure, Geographic Information Systems, and Enterprise Resource Planning platforms, we construct a multi-level maturity model ranging from localized silos to fully cognitive, self-orchestrating integration. We evaluate the impact of maturity on decision-making latency across typical operational scenarios, including grid balancing and outage response. Our simulation and empirical analysis indicate that advancing from low-level point-to-point integration to semantic integration reduces average decision latency by over sixty percent. These findings offer utility executives a structured roadmap to align IT investment with grid reliability and operational resilience.

References

1. Gölzer, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2017). Data-driven operations management: Organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1332–1343.

2. Grover, V. (2022). Digital agility: Responding to digital opportunities. European Journal of Information Systems: An Official Journal of the Operational Research Society, 31(6), 709–715.

3. Zhou, X.; Sou, K.; Gao, Z.; Xiong, J. Integration of digitalization and green finance for sustainable and resilient manufacturing and service operations in China: An empirical analysis. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1604316.

4. Cheng, W.; Li, C.; Zhao, T. The stages of enterprise digital transformation and its impact on internal control: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 92, 103079.

5. Qi, Y.; Huo, B.; Wang, Z.; Yeung, H.Y.J. The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 185, 162–174.

6. Sjøberg, D.I.K. The Relationship Between Software Process, Context and Outcome. In Proceedings of the Product-Focused Software Process Improvement; Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 3–11.

7. Abrell, T., Pihlajamaa, M., Kanto, L., Vom Brocke, J., & Uebernickel, F. (2016). The role of users and customers in digital innovation: Insights from B2B manufacturing firms. Information & Management, 53(3), 324–335.

8. Triska, Y.; Frazzon, E.M.; Silva, V.M.D.; Heilig, L. Smart port terminals: Conceptual framework, maturity modeling and research agenda. Marit. Policy Manag. 2024, 51, 259–282.

9. Asatiani, A., & Torell, J. (2023). Balancing digital debt and digital options: Challenges of digital transformation at Green Cargo. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 13(2), 154–164.

10. Buh, B., Kovačič, A., & Indihar Štemberger, M. (2015). Critical success factors for different stages of business process management adoption—A case study. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 243–258.

11. Issa, A., Hatiboglu, B., Bildstein, A., & Bauernhansl, T. (2018). Industrie 4.0 roadmap: Framework for digital transformation based on the concepts of capability maturity and alignment. Procedia CIRP, 72, 973–978.

12. Schneider, D., Huth, T., & Vietor, T. (2021). Development of an Industry 4.0 method and knowledge platform for strategic technology implementation. Procedia CIRP, 100, 613–618.

13. Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles