Lifecycle Information Models for Carbon Accounting in Transportation Megaprojects

Authors

  • Raymond Ka-Man Chau Department of Information Systems, Business Statistics and Operations Management, School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Carbon Accounting, Lifecycle Information Modeling, Process Modeling, Transportation Megaprojects, Lifecycle Information Models

Abstract

Transportation megaprojects represent a significant proportion of global infrastructure investment and are corresponding major contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions. Accurately predicting and managing carbon emissions throughout the lifecycle of these massive undertakings is critical for achieving international climate targets. However, traditional carbon accounting methods rely heavily on static lifecycle assessments that struggle to adapt to the dynamic and complex nature of megaproject delivery. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into predicting carbon accounting by integrating Lifecycle Information Models with advanced process modeling techniques. By utilizing process modeling to map out the intricate workflows of planning, construction, operation, and end-of-life phases, and dynamically linking these models to the rich data environments of Lifecycle Information Models, a continuous and adaptive carbon accounting mechanism is established. The research explores the theoretical underpinnings of this integration, details a robust methodological framework for practical implementation, and evaluates the expected outcomes through analytical discussions. The findings indicate that replacing static assessments with dynamic, process-oriented data integration significantly enhances the precision, traceability, and optimization potential of carbon management in transportation infrastructure. This approach enables proactive decision-making, allowing stakeholders to identify emission hotspots early and implement targeted mitigation strategies.

References

1. Daamen, T. Strategy as Force: Towards Effective Strategies for Urban Development Projects: The Case of Rotterdam City Ports; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010.

2. Adenuga, T.; Ayobami, A.T.; Okolo, F.C. AI-Driven Workforce Forecasting for Peak Planning and Disruption Resilience in Global Logistics and Supply Networks. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval. 2020, 2, 71–87.

3. Grant, M.J.; Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2009, 26, 91–108.

4. Xie, H.; Qin, Z.; Li, J. ESG performance and corporate carbon emission intensity: Based on panel data analysis of A-share listed companies. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1483237.

5. Zavvos, E.; Zavitsas, K.; Latinopoulos, C.; Leemen, V.; Halatsis, A. Digital Twins for Synchronized Port-Centric Optimization Enabling Shipping Emissions Reduction. In State-of-the-Art Digital Twin Applications for Shipping Sector Decarbonization; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 137–160.

6. Ilin, I.; Jahn, C.; Weigell, J.; Kalyazina, S. Digital technology implementation for smart city and smart port cooperation. In International Conference on Digital Technologies in Logistics and Infrastructure (ICDTLI 2019); Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 493–496.

7. Bharosa, N. (2022). The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101692.

8. Ezeamii, V.C.; Okobi, O.E.; Wambai-Sani, H.; Perera, G.S.; Zaynieva, S.; Okonkwo, C.C.; Ohaiba, M.M.; William-Enemali, P.C.; Obodo, O.R.; Obiefuna, N.G. Revolutionizing Healthcare: How Telemedicine Is Improving Patient Outcomes and Expanding Access to Care. Cureus 2024, 16, e63881. [ Central]

9. Cao, B.; Li, L.; Zhang, K.; Ma, W. The influence of digital intelligence transformation on carbon emission reduction in manufacturing firms. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 121987.

10. Sabbioni, A.; Corradi, A.; Monti, S.; De Rolt, C.R. From Digital Services to Sustainable Ones: Novel Industry 5.0 Environments Enhanced by Observability. Information 2025, 16, 821.

11. Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92–93, 102012.

12. Kotarba, M. (2018). Digital transformation of business models. Foundations of Management, 10(1), 123–142.

13. Xie, X.; Gong, C.; Su, Z.; Nie, Y.; Kim, W. Consumers’ behavioral willingness to use green financial products: An empirical study within a theoretical framework. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 634.

14. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 105–124.

15. Touloumidis, D.; Madas, M.; Zeimpekis, V.; Ayfantopoulou, G. Weather-Related Disruptions in Transportation and Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review and a Policy Implementation Roadmap. Logistics 2025, 9, 32.

16. Huber, S.; Lorey, T.; Felderer, M. Techniques for Improving the Energy Efficiency of Mobile Apps: A Taxonomy and Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2023 49th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Durres, Albania, 6–8 September 2023; pp. 286–292.

17. Hidalgo, M.; Yanine, F.; Paredes, R.; Frez, J.; Solar, M. What Is the Process? A Metamodel of the Requirements Elicitation Process Derived from a Systematic Literature Review. Processes 2025, 13, 20.

18. Agarwal, P.; Malhotra, S.K.; Swami, S. The role of smart technologies in managing supply chain post pandemic: An exploratory scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature review. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2025, 16, 706–732.

19. Monferdini, L.; Bottani, E. Examining the Response to COVID-19 in Logistics and Supply Chain Processes: Insights from a State-of-the-Art Literature Review and Case Study Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5317.

20. Allioui, H.; Allioui, A.; Mourdi, Y. Maintaining effective logistics management during and after COVID-19 pandemic: Survey on the importance of artificial intelligence to enhance recovery strategies. Opsearch 2024, 61, 918–962.

21. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report 2024: No More Hot Air … Please! With a Massive Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality, Countries Draft New Climate Commitments; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2024.

22. Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government—A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178.

23. Blyde, J.S. Synchronized Factories: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Era of Global Value Chains; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; p. 141.

24. McKinnon, A. Decarbonizing Logistics: Distributing Goods in a Low Carbon World; Kogan Page Publishers: London, UK, 2018.

25. Sanders, N.R. Supply Chain Management, with eBook Access Code: A Global Perspective; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025.

26. Helfat, C.; Martin, J. Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change. J. Manag. 2015, 41, 1281–1312.

27. Gust, G.; Neumann, D.; Flath, C.; Brandt, T.; Stroehle, P. How a Traditional Company Seeded New Analytics Capabilities. MIS Q. Exec. 2017, 16, 215–230.

28. Oyedokun, T.T.; Ishola, J.A. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Resilience in Industry 5.0: Strategies for Small Businesses. In Insights Into Digital Business, Human Resource Management, and Competitiveness; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 35–68.

29. Magableh, G.M. Supply chains and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive framework. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2021, 18, 363–382.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles