Data Quality with Information Governance Practices and Knowledge Transfer across Infrastructure Delivery Programs
Keywords:
Information Governance, Knowledge Transfer, Data Quality, Infrastructure Delivery, Software EngineeringAbstract
Modern infrastructure delivery programs are increasingly characterized by high levels of digital complexity, generating massive volumes of data across extended lifecycles. However, asset owners and delivery consortia frequently struggle with poor data quality, which directly contributes to cost overruns, schedule delays, and compromised asset operational efficiency. While technological solutions are commonly proposed to address these challenges, this study argues that data quality is fundamentally a socio-technical phenomenon. We investigate how formal information governance practices and structured knowledge transfer mechanisms explain variation in data quality within large-scale infrastructure programs. Using structural equation modeling applied to empirical data collected from project delivery professionals across major transport, energy, and utility infrastructure programs, we analyze the direct and indirect pathways connecting governance to data quality. The results demonstrate that while information governance practices establish the necessary rules and accountability frameworks, their direct impact on data quality is significantly amplified when mediated by robust knowledge transfer processes. This research provides a novel theoretical synthesis of information governance and knowledge management in project-based environments, offering actionable insights for program directors seeking to leverage data as a strategic asset.References
1. MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2022). A systematic literature review of empirical research on the impacts of e-government: A public value perspective. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 23–38.
2. Heilig, L.; Schwarze, S.; Voß, S. An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports. 2017. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/56dffdc6-c8db-42de-9c4e-8585cce8515c (accessed on 12 January 2025).
3. Fan, Y.; Guoyong, W.; Riaz, N.; Radlińska, K. Technical efficiency and farm size in the context of sustainable agriculture. Agric. Econ. 2024, 70, 446–456.
4. Matarazzo, M.; Penco, L.; Profumo, G.; Quaglia, R. Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 642–656.
5. Sys, C.; Vanelslander, T. Future maritime supply networks: Key issues in and solutions. In Maritime Supply Chains; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 261–282.
6. Sarkar, B.D.; Shankar, R.; Kar, A.K. Port logistic issues and challenges in the Industry 4.0 era for emerging economies: An India perspective. Benchmarking Int. J. 2023, 30, 50–74.
7. Tsiulin, S.; Reinau, K.H.; Hilmola, O.P.; Goryaev, N.; Karam, A. Blockchain-based applications in shipping and port management: A literature review towards defining key conceptual frameworks. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 2020, 30, 201–224.
8. Moi, L., & Cabiddu, F. (2021). Leading digital transformation through an Agile marketing capability: The case of Spotahome. Journal of Management & Governance, 25(4), 1145–1177.
9. Huang, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, L.; Yarovaya, L. Corporate digital transformation and idiosyncratic risk: Based on corporate governance perspective. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 2023, 56, 101045.
10. Xiong, X. Examining the influence of knowledge transfer and dynamic capabilities on enterprise digital transformation. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0311176.
11. Peter, M. K., Kraft, C., & Lindeque, J. (2020). Strategic action fields of digital transformation: An exploration of the strategic action fields of Swiss SMEs and large enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(1), 160–180.
12. Yang, X.; Han, Q. Nonlinear effects of enterprise digital transformation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from China. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2024, 15, 355–381.
13. European Commission. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, Publications Office. 2019. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540 (accessed on 15 January 2026).
14. Albert, M.B.; Avery, D.; Narin, F.; McAllister, P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy 1991, 20, 251–259.
15. Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: Strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724.
16. Tsekouropoulos, G., Vasileiou, A., Hoxha, G., Theocharis, D., Theodoridou, E., & Grigoriadis, T. (2025). Leadership 4.0: Navigating the challenges of the digital transformation in healthcare and beyond. Administrative Sciences, 15(6), 194.
17. Qi, Y.; Chen, Q.; Yang, M.; Sun, Y. Ambidextrous knowledge accumulation, dynamic capability and manufacturing digital transformation in China. J. Knowl. Manag. 2024, 28, 2275–2305.
18. Veena, G.; Balamurugan, B.B.; Mariofanna, M.; Yovan, F.A. Blockchain, IoT, and AI Technologies for Supply Chain Management: Apply Emerging Technologies to Address and Improve Supply Chain Management; Apress Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2024.
19. Sofrankova, B.; Sira, E.; Horvathova, J.; Mokrisova, M. Digital Skills and Digital Transformation Performance in the EU-27: A DESI-Based Nonparametric and Panel Data Study. Economies 2025, 13, 315.
20. Cai, S.; Chen, X.; Bose, I. Exploring the role of IT for environmental sustainability in China: An empirical analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2013, 146, 491–500.
21. Su, Z.; Liu, Y.; Fang, M.; Liu, Z.; Su, M. Couples traveling together and long-haul truckers’ transport performance: A theory-based empirical test. Travel Behav. Soc. 2024, 37, 100833.
22. Mvubu, M.; Naude, M.J. Digital transformation at third-party logistics providers: Challenges and best practices. J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 2024, 18, 1023.
23. Coe, N.M. Missing links: Logistics, governance and upgrading in a shifting global economy. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 2017, 21, 224–256.
24. Wei, J.; Shen, Y. Impact and mechanism of digital transformation on performance in manufacturing firms. Innov. Green Dev. 2025, 4, 100205.
25. An, J. Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: Review and research trend. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2024, 9, 229–242.
26. Yunis, M., Tarhini, A., & Kassar, A. (2018). The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 88, 344–356.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.